introduced hard disk drives with breakthrough capacities designed for near line storage applications. Yes No Sending feedback... In a simple RAID1 group of two drives, the Archive took over 57 hours to rebuild while the NAS was idle. The drive comes with impressive burst results but lower sustained write results, which are to be expected in this classSMR drives. this contact form
Greene 4.0 out of 5 starsHuge but slow drive. Most other drives of this size start at about £135.Toshiba X300 5TB 3.5-inch Extreme-Performance Hard Drive | Now £146.65 | BTThis speedy 7200RPM hard drive is excellent value if you're looking Enter your phone number and we will connect you! All I need are two and I'm happy for along time, that is until I start ripping Blu-ray.
Sustained write performance in this case is a weaknessthat we see throughoutthe rest of our tests. The sides of the Seagate Archive HDD feature a total of four screw holes, which allows us to mount the drive. Black 750gb-&1-1tb/3-3.5 WD Black 1tb hdd's Internet Speed Comcast Ping 19ms 89.31mbps download speed 6.12mbps upload Antivirus Panda Free/ Malwarebytes Pro/ Superantispyware Pro Browser FireFox & Pale moon Other Info 2nd Sold by Seagate under the "Archive Label" brand and aimed at those looking for a cost-effective storage solution, the drive retails for around $270, which is far more palatable than the
These were installed in a Synology DS1815+ and DS1515+ respectively, where a RAID1 volume was created and then a single drive was pulled to put the RAID-set into a degraded mode.The Reliable Data Retrieval for Cold Data Storage Seagate offers the industry's widest selection of standards-based self-encrypting storage. If you're not sure about going with the KingDian deal above, then this is your best deal for a more recognised brand.Crucial MX300 275GB SATA SSD | Now £77.99 | Amazon240GB 8tb Hard Drive Wd In this benchmark, the Seagate Archive 8TB posted read and write speeds of 188.02MB/s and 187.21MB/s, respectively.
And, it's significantly more affordable than OCZ's 1TB SSD released only five years ago (remember when 1TB drives excited you?) for $2,200. Ultimately the Seagate Archive 8TB HDD has a lot of legs in very specific use cases. Sell on Amazon Image Unavailable Image not available forColor: Seagate Archive HDD 8TB SATA 6GBps 128MB Cache SATA Hard Drive (ST8000AS0002) by Seagate 3.9 out of 5 stars 224 customer reviews So again, most of the time files will be read from these drives and not written, except for once a week when there will be large dumps from the fast expensive
In order to navigate out of this carousel please use your heading shortcut key to navigate to the next or previous heading. Seagate 8tb Internal Hard Drive The prices have gotten semi affordable on them and I have found the best deal on hdd's is 2tb and up. Back Seagate 8TB BarraCuda Pro SATA 6Gb/s 256MB Cache 3.5-Inch Internal Hard Drive (ST8000DM005) 4.4 out of 5 stars 487 $329.99 Prime WD Red 8TB NAS Hard Disk Drive - 5400 If you're wanting to give your laptop a boost, you'll want to check our latest SSD deals.
Seagate’s new 8TB HDD provides IT managers with a new option for improving storage density in the data center, thus helping them to tackle one of the largest and fastest growing In our average latency test (CIFS) for mixed 8K 70/30 workload, the Seagate Enterprise measured 35.05 at 2T/2Q and 1,231.05ms by 16T/16Q. Seagate 8tb External Hard Drive Seagate offers the Archive in 8TB, 6TB and 5TB capacities (1.33TB platters)with encryption optional. 8tb Hard Drive Internal Would you like to tell us about a lower price?
Prices have been going up on most drives in recent weeks, so this one may sell out fast. weblink International Shipping This item is not eligible for international shipping. See and discover other items: sata disk Back to top Get to Know UsCareersAbout AmazonInvestor RelationsAmazon DevicesMake Money with UsSell on AmazonSell Your Services on AmazonSell on Amazon BusinessSell Your Apps Seagate preps Archive HDDs: 5TB, 6TB and 8TB at low price-points Home News Reviews Previews Community Compare Prices Channel Cebit CES Computex Event General Tech Science Component APU Bundles Cases Cooling Seagate Archive Hdd 8tb
However we saw sustained read speeds during a 400GB VM recovery in excess of 180MB/s, which is really the core metric. The 128K large block sequential showed pretty good results however, with speeds of 195MB/s read and 194MB/s write. Hardware & Devices Comparing 2tb hard drives. navigate here All rights reserved.
but still fast enough to play back 1080p high bitrate video (if it's not doing anything else). Seagate Backup Plus Desktop Hdd The HGST He8 HDDs completed its rebuild in 19 hours and 46 minutes. That's ok, we have some even larger hard drive deals below.Seagate ST8000AS0002 Archive 8TB 3.5-inch Hard Disc Drive | Now £204.71 | AmazonOk, just over £200 for a 8TB hard drive
In these tests, we span workload intensity from 2 threads and 2 queue up to 16 threads and 16 queue. Thank you for your feedback. or Add to List Sorry, there was a problem. Seagate 8tb Nas When looking at average latency benchmark (CIFS) 16 Thread 16 Queue 100% read and write, the Seagate Archive measured 497.07ms read and 206.06ms write.
Once the five small screws have been removed, you can open up the drive and remove the circuit board from the body of the Seagate Archive HDD. Seagate offers low-cost 8TB hard drives | ZDNet My System Specs System Manufacturer/Model Number HP, Dell, Gateway, Toshiba - 4 laptops and 2 desktops OS Vista, Windows7, Mint Mate, Zorin, Windows This works because the read head on the drive is smaller than the write head. http://ksresource.net/hard-drive/switching-hard-drives.html The write performance numbers were, unsurprisingly, far below the results of the other drives.
It should be noted though that the FIO results do not match the Veeam application testing where the sustained writes were much lower. New, used, and refurbished products purchased from Marketplace vendors are subject to the returns policy of the individual vendor. I save everything to my server array on a solid state drive throughout the week, and I have a mover script that is built into the unRAID OS that moves the In these tests, CIFS configurations did result in better results for write numbers.
In throughput, the Seagate Archive posted 10 IOPS at 2 Threads 2 Queue, which remained virtually unchanged with a 16 Threads 16 Queue IOPS of 10 as well. Formatted EXT3 faster than I expected, and complete backup was started within a few minutes Published 1 month ago by L.R. Even at a lowly 300 000 hours MTBF, and usually MTBF are only good for 50% of the projected reliability, that's still 17 years of service on average. In this system we installed 8 Archive HDDswithout RAID and addressed them individually inside Windows Server 2012 R2.
Amazon only has a 20-pack bundle for sale right now, and it won't be sent your way until January 2015. The 8TB Seagate is designed for low cost massive long term storage where speed is not as important as storage space, which explains why it's so much cheaper than an HGST An 8TB PMR drive took a bit under 20 hours. To allow our configuration to cope to a single drive failure, we also setup a 2nd task to copy the backup data to a a second HDD (drives 5-8).
While we don't have a benchmark to test at that scale yet, however one scenario we built outis a Veeam backup server test. Given the low cost/TB, the drives do very well here if the backup admin can get a little creative. Since I have to actually have a backup, I also ordered the same drive but in a USB enclosure a few days ago. First, the massive 8TB capacity is Seagate's highest to date.
The drive contains six platters and uses Shingled Magnetic Recording technology that allows an extra 25 percent more data per platter. Edition: Asia Australia Europe India United Kingdom United States ZDNet around the globe: ZDNet Belgium ZDNet China ZDNet France ZDNet Germany ZDNet Korea ZDNet Japan Go Central Europe Middle East Scandinavia For hyper-scale deployments that are SMR aware, specially designed software can be used to replicate data across multiple drives in a fashion that won't have the RAID rebuild penalty in a Needless to say in a larger RAID group or with background activity taking place, that rebuildtime will only get longer.